Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Committee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1992No. C7-91-1898PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
We accepted review of the decision of the court of appeals denying the Minnesota Ethical Practices Board’s motion to discharge a writ of certiorari issued upon petition of relator Russell L. Doty to consider the issue of his standing to petition for a writ of certiorari. We reverse.
In the 1990 DFL'primary Sandra Pappas defeated Donald Moe for the office of State Senator of District 65. She went on to win the general election.
In August 1990 Pappas signed a contract with the Board in which she agreed to abide by the terms of the Ethics in Government Act. By a 20-page complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- McKee v. LikinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re Acquisition of Flying Cloud AirportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Tax Ease Lien Investments 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Bank & TrustKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Webb Golden Valley, LLC, Evelyn Thomson v. State of Minnesota, Global One Golden Valley, LLC, Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Olson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.