Legal Opinion
In Re the Implementation of Utility Energy Conservation Improvement Programs
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1985No. C7-84-2241PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Hanna Mining Company appeals from an order approving Peoples Natural Gas Company’s conservation improvement program and the denial of its motion for reconsideration. It contends the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) failed to follow appropriate procedures and erred by not ordering a contested case. We remand.
FACTS
In 1983, the legislature amended Minn. Stat. § 216B.241 to require the MPUC to:
insure that every public utility with operating revenues in excess of $50,000,000 operate one or more programs * * * which make significant investments in and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sellers v. Iowa Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
- State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers, & Land Surveyors v. GetsugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Monk & Excelsior, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- L.K. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal FacilityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re the Alleged Labor Law Violation of Chafoulias Management Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Matter of Intra-Lata Equal AccessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.