Legal Opinion

Perry v. Rein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2003No. 0009-09797; A116471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff, an Oregon attorney, appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, who are also attorneys, on plaintiffs claim for wrongful initiation of civil proceedings. ORCP 47. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in determining, as a matter of law, that defendants had probable cause to prosecute the underlying action, an action that alleged that plaintiff had, among other things, conspired to defraud a third party of $1 million. We reverse and remand.

Because this case was resolved on a motion for summary judgment, we view the summary judgment record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Perry v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. DeHarpport v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Paatalo v. Lincoln CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  5. Perry v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API