Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perry v. Rein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 2007No. 000909797; A126163Published

1ConcurrenceOrtega, J.

Despite my disagreement with the result reached by the majority, I concur because I believe we are bound by our decision in Perry v. Rein, 187 Or App 572, 582-83, 71 P3d 81 (2003) (Perry I), in which we treated the disposition of the underlying claim against plaintiff as a voluntary dismissal, rather than a settlement, despite the fact that the dismissal occurred in the context of a settlement. As a matter of law, a settlement is not a favorable termination for purposes of a wrongful initiation action. Gowin v. Heider, 237 Or 266, 279, 386 P2d 1 (1963), on reh’g, 391 P2d 630 (1964).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Davis v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Perry v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Cyberco Holdings, Inc. Ex Rel. Richardson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API