Legal Opinion

ACAP Financial, Inc. v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2015No. 13-9592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Greyfield Capital was a defunct Canadian company. That is, until a couple of con men got their hands on a signature stamp belonging to the company’s -former president. The men made liberal use of that stamp, employing it to appoint themselves corporate officers, issue millions of unregistered shares in their names, and then embark on a classic penny stock pump- and-dump scheme. They issued press releases touting Greyfield as a “premium automobile dealership” experiencing “explosive growth” and “quickly becoming the largest ... in western Canada” — even though they never…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mid Atlantic Capital v. BienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Badgerow v. REJ Properties, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. George Franklin Wells v. Versaille Capital Advisors, LLC, FundTeq, and Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Saad v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Saad v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API