ACAP Financial, Inc. v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Greyfield Capital was a defunct Canadian company. That is, until a couple of con men got their hands on a signature stamp belonging to the company’s -former president. The men made liberal use of that stamp, employing it to appoint themselves corporate officers, issue millions of unregistered shares in their names, and then embark on a classic penny stock pump- and-dump scheme. They issued press releases touting Greyfield as a “premium automobile dealership” experiencing “explosive growth” and “quickly becoming the largest ... in western Canada” — even though they never…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mid Atlantic Capital v. BienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Badgerow v. REJ Properties, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
- George Franklin Wells v. Versaille Capital Advisors, LLC, FundTeq, and Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Saad v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Saad v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.