Legal Opinion

Baird v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

These are cross appeals from the judgment of tbe Court of. Claims.

Baird, as tbe surviving member of tbe firm of M. W. Baldwim & Co., was tbe petitioner; That court gave him a judgment for • $23,750. He appealed, and contends that be is entitled to recover a much larger sum. Tbe United States appealed, and insist that be is entitled to nothing. Tbe finding of facts presents tbe case as it is before us for examination.

On tbe 17th of March, 1864, tbe United States, by their proper officer, ordered Baldwin & Co. to make for them fifteen locomotive-engines “ at…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McKee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1876
  2. Little v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
  3. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1876
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API