Legal Opinion

State v. Lacy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2014No. H-14-013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Lacy,

2014-Ohio-3858.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. H-14-013 Respondent v. Gary Lacy DECISION AND JUDGMENT Relator Decided: September 4, 2014 ***** Gary Lacy, pro se. ***** OSOWIK, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Gary Lacy, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against respondent, the state of Ohio. In the petition, relator requests that this court issue a writ of mandamus, pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2731, ordering respondent to rule on his petition for postconviction relief, which was filed in the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rust v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bristow v. BaxterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Bristow v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API