American Centennial Insurance Company v. National Casualty Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, American Centennial Insurance Company, and respondents, National Casualty Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company, are parties to numerous reinsurance agreements, each of which contains an arbitration clause. When disputes arose, various demands and cross-demands for arbitration were asserted by the parties. Petitioner sought to have the disputes resolved in a single arbitration proceeding, while respondents resisted, asserting that unique issues were involved and their positions would be prejudiced by consolidation. The arbitration clauses in all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Western Seas Shipping Co., Eastern Seas Shipping Co., and Karlander (Australia) Pty. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Protective Life Insurance Corporation v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Baesler v. Continental Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- American Centennial Insurance v. National Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
3Cited by23 opinions
- Champ v. Siegel Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Local 1351 International Longshoremens Ass'n v. Sea-Land Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Bateman Construction, Inc. v. Haitsuka Bros., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Herrington v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.