Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Company v. Western Seas Shipping Co., Eastern Seas Shipping Co., and Karlander (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1984No. 83-2411PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORRIS, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Weyerhaeuser Company (Wey-erhaeuser) appeals the district court’s denial of its petition to compel the consolidation of two maritime arbitrations into a single arbitration before five arbitrators.

I

Appellee Trans-Pacific Shipping Co. * (Trans-Pacific) owns two ships that were time chartered by Weyerhaeuser. Weyerhaeuser subsequently subchartered the ships to appellee Karlander Australia Party Ltd. (Karlander). During the pendency of the subcharter, a dispute arose concerning cargo stowage restrictions.

Under the standard arbitration clause in the subcharter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Western Seas Shipping Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1983

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Republic of Nicaragua, a Foreign Sovereign v. Standard Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company, and Castle & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. New England Energy Inc. v. Keystone Shipping Company, Keystone Shipping Company v. New England Energy Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Zechman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API