Sandy v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
Dick Sandy appeals a jury conviction for first-degree sexual assault. Appellant, through appellate counsel, presents issues concerning uncharged misconduct and jury instructions. Appellant’s pro se brief asserts he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel, the right to testify, the right to have witnesses testify in his defense, and the right to defend in person and by counsel.
•We affirm.
ISSUES
In his brief prepared by counsel, appellant presents these issues:
I. The trial court erred in allowing introduction of evidence concerning the character and prior bad acts of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Elliott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Bishop v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. VorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Urrutia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.