Legal Opinion

Sandy v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1994No. 93-143PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Dick Sandy appeals a jury conviction for first-degree sexual assault. Appellant, through appellate counsel, presents issues concerning uncharged misconduct and jury instructions. Appellant’s pro se brief asserts he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel, the right to testify, the right to have witnesses testify in his defense, and the right to defend in person and by counsel.

•We affirm.

ISSUES

In his brief prepared by counsel, appellant presents these issues:

I. The trial court erred in allowing introduction of evidence concerning the character and prior bad acts of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Elliott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bishop v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. VorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. Urrutia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API