Legal Opinion
Farrow v. Bramble
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided December 21, 1983No. 04-82-00587-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CADENA, Chief Justice.
ON APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
Plaintiff, Urban Farrow, filed this suit against defendants, Ron L. Bramble, James E. Bauerle, Sr., Norman H. Bevan, William T. Harris, Sidney T. Zarges and William M. Mertz, to recover on a promissory note. On October 16, 1981, the trial court dismissed the case for want of prosecution. Notice of the dismissal was sent to counsel for plaintiff on October 21, and plaintiff filed a motion to reinstate the case on November 12, 1981. An order reinstating the case on the docket was signed on November 18, 1981.
Ten months later, on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glidden Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- N-S-W Corp. v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Washington v. Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- St. Paul Insurance Co. v. RahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Danforth Memorial Hospital v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilbert v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Estate of Leo L. Block, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Everman Independent School District v. Central Education Agency and Fort Worth Indepenent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
- First State Bank of Bishop v. Frost National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hazel Corn v. Martin Weiner, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991