Legal Opinion

Glidden Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1956No. A-5632PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

Petitioners, who supplied materials to the contractor for the construction of a housing project for the Housing Authority of the City of Borger, recovered judgment in the trial court against respondent, the surety on the contractor’s performance and payment bond, for the value of all materials furnished by them. The Court of Civil Appeals concluded that the rights of the parties are governed by the provisions of Art. 5160, Texas Rev. Civ. Stat. 1925, as amended, and reformed the judgment to allow petitioners to recover only for materials which were furnished within ninety days of the filing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holman v. Chevaillier's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Woodrum Truck Lines v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Long v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. E.P. N.E.R.R. Co. v. WhatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Beal's Adm'r v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1851

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davies v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Christy Jean Wand LaCokeTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Buffalo Royalty Corp. v. Enron Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. West Texas Utilities Company v. IrvinTexas Supreme Court · 1960

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API