Legal Opinion

Danforth Memorial Hospital v. Harris

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1978No. B-7682PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Relators have petitioned this court to order the trial judge to vacate an order, which according to relators, reinstated a cause after the court had lost jurisdiction under Rule 165a. 1 We conditionally grant the mandamus.

These proceedings grew out of an action asserted by Robert Medina and his wife against our three relators, Johnson Radiological Group, Danforth Memorial Hospital, and Jesse Johnson. After the cause had remained on the docket for two years, the cause was placed on the drop docket, and it was dismissed for want of prosecution on July 5,1977. The trial court, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reese v. PiperiTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. N-S-W Corp. v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Calaway v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Johnson Radiological Group v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Harris County v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Alvarado v. Magic Valley Electric Co-Op, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  5. Gilbert v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API