Legal Opinion
Kirkendall v. Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 3, 2006No. 05-3077PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*194 ORDER
2Per curiam
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc having been filed by respondent, and response thereto having been waived by petitioner, the petition for panel rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition for rehearing en banc is granted.
The court vacates the panel’s judgment and original opinion entered June 22, 2005, John E. Kirkendall v. Department of the Army, 412 F.3d 1273 (Fed.Cir.2005).
The…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- John E. Kirkendall v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
4Cited by4 opinions
- Kirkendall v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kirkendall v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007