Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2007No. 04-15788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

490 F.3d 725

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND; Animal Welfare Institute; Valerie Buchanan; Jane Garrison; Nancy Megna, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

National Association for Biomedical Research, Intervenor-Appellee,

v.

Ann M. VENEMAN; Bobby R. Acord; Chester A. Gipson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15788.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 4, 2007.

Howard M. Crystal, Katherine A. Meyer, Meyer & Glitzenstein, Bruce A. Wagman, Schiff Hardin LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Robert A. Long, Jr., Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for Intervenor-Appellee.

Michael Jay Singer, U.S.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garcia v. BenovDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API