Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Clark

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for La Crosse county: Jakes Wickham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

Tbe plaintiff corporation executed a policy of plate glass insurance on property abutting upon a highway. Tbe plate glass was broken by defendants’ team of horses, which, running away, dashed into the plate glass window. The plaintiff replaced the plate glass at an expense of $104, took an assignment of their right of action against the defendants from the owners of the plate glass window, and brought this action for damages, charging the defendants in two separate counts with trespass and with negligence. •

The jury by its verdict acquitted the defendants of negligence. There was, however,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bulpit v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chunot v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Pettit v. MayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Pillsbury v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Erdman v. GottshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ketelsen v. StilzIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. Tautges, Rerat & WelchNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Civic Developments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API