Legal Opinion

Ketelsen v. Stilz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1916No. 22,942PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (88,419); Charles J. Orbison, Judge. Action by Anna Ketelsen against Fred D. Stilz and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages resulting to her from an exchange of a piece of real estate for real estate owned by one Mc-Cleay, which damages were alleged to have been occasioned by the fraud of appellees. It appears from the allegations of the complaint that appellees were real estate agents and that as such they, sold to appellant a piece of property assuring her at the time that in case she desired to dispose of it they would assist her without charge. Appellant afterward consulted appellees with reference to the disposition of the property and was informed that they…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sayward v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  3. Beardsley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  4. Robert v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  5. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API