Legal Opinion
VanWulfen v. Montmorency County
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 10, 2004No. 04-10098-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWSON, District judge.
The plaintiff, Frank VanWulfen, owns property on the shore of an inland lake located in Montmorency County, Michigan. The water level of the lake can be adjusted by changing the flow of water through a dam at the lake’s East end. The water level is regulated by the" county drain commissioner in accordance with procedures set forth in Michigan’s Inland Lake Levels Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.30701 et seq. The plaintiff has filed a complaint in this Court alleging…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kesler v. Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- McCloy v. CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Neuenfeldt v. Williams TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Frank Van Wulfen v. County of MontmorencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Morgan v. BarkerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020