Legal Opinion

Neuenfeldt v. Williams Township

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 9, 2005No. 04-10133-BCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO AMEND COMPLAINT

LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case has filed an amended complaint alleging that Williams Township officials treated him unfairly when they rejected his proposed plat plan for developing a subdivision and requiring instead that the development include two “stub streets” as a condition of approval. He claims that the Township’s requirements for his proposed development was more exacting than for other developers who were similarly situated, and his rights under the Due Process and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

McCausland v. CantonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019