Legal Opinion
Maine Beauty Schools, Inc. v. State Board of Hairdressers
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 11, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On report. The controversy centers upon an amendment (Chapter 349 P.L.1965) to our statute regulating hairdressers and beauticians (32 M.R.S.A. §§ 1551-1657). The amendment adds three sentences to § 1553, which section prescribes the qualifications for schools of hairdressing and beauty culture, including the study hours required, and a provision that such study hours may include “practical demonstrations.” The amendment reads as follows.
“Practical demonstrations will include supervised practice which shall consist of rendering service to persons other than fellow students,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- T. E. McRae v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- McGary v. BarrowsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Berger v. State Board of HairdressingSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Houle v. DuvallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971