Legal Opinion
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Pitu, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 27, 2012No. 3D11-2233PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Chief Judge.
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. 828-2037 (“Lloyd’s”) appeals from a declaratory judgment awarding homeowner Pitu, Inc., $1,240,199.67, plus interest for water damage sustained following a water pipe rupture. Because the insurance policy at issue expressly limits recovery for such damage to $25,000, we reverse.
On May 29, 2009, Lloyd’s issued an “all risk” homeowner’s insurance policy to Pitu for a dwelling located in Miami-Dade County. While the policy was in effect, a water pipe located in one of the upper stories of the home…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PridgenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MenendezSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- National Indemnity Co. v. CorboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- General Star Indem. Co. v. W. Fla. Village Inn, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. HradeckyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- CHARLES HERRINGTON v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.