Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Jimenez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”) appeals a final judgment following a non-jury trial, in which the trial court granted declaratory relief to Raul and Ada Jimenez, the appellees/home-owners, and determined that Lloyd’s was not entitled to rescission of the property insurance policy issued to the homeowners. We reverse because the misrepresentation by the Jimenezes in the insurance application was material and was detrimentally relied upon by Lloyd’s, precluding coverage for the Jimenez’s kitchen fire and entitling Lloyd’s to rescission of the policy.
In 2007, appellee Raul…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. ShiffletSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Fabric v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Gonzalez v. Eagle Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. ArvidsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Pitu, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JERMAINE NEMBHARD AND DONNETTE NEMBHARD v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. LiebowitzDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. LiebowitzDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022