Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Madison v. Halvorson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1929No. 27,147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Replevin for certain horses, cattle, some farm machinery and grain, wherein, after trial to the court Avithout a jury, defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff claims as a mortgagee of the chattels, but in the complaint alleged ownership and the right to possession generally. It averred a demand upon defendant and his refusal to deliver. The answer admits the demand and refusal but denies the complaint otherwise, and asserts that defendant as owner is entitled to possession. There was no reference in complaint or answer to the chattel mortgage and no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Adamson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Trovatten v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Hanson v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. O. W. Kerr Co. v. NygrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API