Legal Opinion

Neale v. American Motorists Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeal, No. 200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit to recover on a policy of insurance issued by defendants covering damage by fire to plaintiff’s Ford truck. Defendants’ amended answer set up a release signed by the plaintiff. After reciting the issuance of the policy, the loss by fire, and the actual damage, the release contained the following:

“Now, therefore, in consideration of the matters related herein, it is agreed as follows:
“1. The Insured does hereby release and discharge the Insurer of and from any and all claims and demands under the said policy resulting from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Nissenbaum v. FarleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Blose v. MartensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Lucas v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Contractor Utility Sales Co. v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Moffatt Enterprises, Inc. v. Borden Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. McNallySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API