Legal Opinion
Neale v. American Motorists Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeal, No. 200PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit to recover on a policy of insurance issued by defendants covering damage by fire to plaintiff’s Ford truck. Defendants’ amended answer set up a release signed by the plaintiff. After reciting the issuance of the policy, the loss by fire, and the actual damage, the release contained the following:
“Now, therefore, in consideration of the matters related herein, it is agreed as follows:
“1. The Insured does hereby release and discharge the Insurer of and from any and all claims and demands under the said policy resulting from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Nissenbaum v. FarleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Blose v. MartensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Lucas v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by8 opinions
- Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Contractor Utility Sales Co. v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Moffatt Enterprises, Inc. v. Borden Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. McNallySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.