Wood v. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
4 1 Plaintiffs appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. On appeal, Plaintiffs contend material issues of fact exist, making summary judgment improper. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
T2 Plaintiffs Wood, Tanner, Stokes, and Syphus are all former insurance agents of Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Farm Bureau). They wrote and serviced Farm Bureau insurance policies for clients. In the course of their work, Plaintiffs kept records regarding the policies and policy holders they serviced. Plaintiffs received an initial commission…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Mayer v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Saunders v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Five F, L.L.C. v. Heritage Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Francisconi v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Wayment v. Schneider Automotive GroupCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Bowen v. HartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Evans v. Brigham Young UniversityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.