Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 19, 1995No. 17941-5-IIPublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, C.J.
Dr. Harold Mayer appeals a summary judgment in favor of the Pierce County Medical Bureau in this breach of contract action. Finding that the trial court properly construed the contract, and that Mayer was not entitled to due process before cancellation of his Preferred Provider status, we affirm.
Facts
Dr. Mayer practiced internal medicine. In 1966 he became a member of the Pierce County Medical Bureau (the Bureau), a nonprofit health care provider that contracts with physicians and hospitals to provide benefits to its health plan subscribers.
In 1984, Mayer entered into a "Participation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Higgins v. StaffordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Shelton v. SheltonNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2953, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2754, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3793, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23942f Thomas A. Barnhart, Husband Nancy J. Barnhart, Wife v. New York Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation New York Insurance and Annuity Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- GMAC v. Everett Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Dice v. City of MontesanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.