Legal Opinion
Pearsen v. Lemken
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 4, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.
This is an action for broker’s commissions. The plaintiff, a real estate broker, testified that she received a listing for the house in question on February 7, 1961, from Mrs. Lemken, one of the defendants. Thereafter on March 12, she introduced the prospective purchaser to the defendants, and Mrs. Lemken showed various parts of the house to the prospective purchaser. The next day, March 13, when plaintiff telephoned Mrs. Lemken ‘ ‘ to check the personalty that went with the house ”, plaintiff was told that “ the property was not in their name; it was in their son’s name”. Mrs. Lemken…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Haase v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Arnold v. SchmeidlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- House v. HornburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In Re the Accounting of AltzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kaelin v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sanders A. Kahn Associates, Inc. v. MaidmanNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Falk v. KrummAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Kalmon Dolgin Affiliates, Inc. v. Estate of NutmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Scriven v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.