Arnold v. Schmeidler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Leopold Schmeidler and others, composing the firm, etc., from an order of the Appellate Term of. the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of December, 1910, affirming a judgment-of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff, entered in _ the office of the clerk of said court on the 6th day of May, ■ Í910, upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
The cause of action upon which plaintiff has recovered herein is based upon allegations that in February, 1909, defendants, who were owners of premises known as Nos. 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 West One Hundred and Tenth street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, authorized and employed the plaintiff and one Harrison, real estate brokers, “ to find for them a person or persons ready, able and willing to buy the said five (5) lots and houses thereon or any one or more thereof, upon certain terms and conditions, ” and agreed to pay the brokers a commission of one per cent for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Backer v. RatkowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kaelin v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- House v. HornburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- E. A. Strout Farm Agency, Inc. v. DeForestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Saum v. Capital Realty Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- John M. Thompson & Co. v. New Madison Square Garden Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.