Legal Opinion
United States v. Norman D. Carter, Cecilia P. Carter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1990No. 89-35526PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Norman D. Carter appeals pro se the district court’s orders granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment and denying Carter’s motion for reconsideration. 1
FACTS
On December 8, 1987, the United States filed a complaint against Norman D. and Cecilia P. Carter (the “Carters”) in the federal district court for the Western District of Washington. The government sought to reduce to judgment certain unpaid tax liabilities of the Carters and to recover under 26 U.S.C. § 7405(b) an erroneous tax refund paid to Norman Carter.
The case was scheduled for trial on April 17,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Association of Mexican-American Educators ("AMAE") v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- United States v. Jeffrey PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Commonwealth Energy System & Subsidiary CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Lensch v. Armada Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.