Legal Opinion
Leakley v. Canadian Pacific Express Co.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 8, 1949No. 5977-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
By this action the plaintiffs seek to recover damages in the sum of $690 resulting from an alleged breach of contract on *256the part of defendant to transport three foxes from the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada, to Wrangell, Alaska. .
The defendant, appearing specially, has moved to quash the service of summons made on the Clerk of this Court under Section 55-4-6, A.C.L.A.1949, on several grounds, the principal of which is that at the time of said service defendant was not and had not been doing business in the Territory. In support of its motion defendant filed affidavits…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951