Legal Opinion

Omalza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 29, 1995No. F-93-141, F-93-336, and F-93-65Published

1Opinion of the Court

911 P.2d 286 (1995)

Alfredo OMALZA, Ronnie Lee Floyd, David Lee Flippo, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

Nos. F-93-141, F-93-336, and F-93-65.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

December 29, 1995.

Rehearing Denied February 27, 1996.

William Devinney, Gary Shores, Oklahoma City, for Omalza at trial and on appeal.

James Berry, Sherry T. Wallace, Oklahoma City, for Floyd at trial.

Richard Anderson, David Autry, Oklahoma City, for Flippo at trial and on brief.

Fern Smith, Sandra Stensaas, Oklahoma City, for State at trial.

James Berry, Oklahoma City, for Floyd on appeal.

Susan Brimer Loving,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API