Legal Opinion
Unpingco v. Hong Kong Macau Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1991No. 90-15725PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the Appellate Division of the United States District Court for the Territory of Guam affirming the Guam Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.
FACTS
On October 15, 1962, Jose and Vicenta Unpingco, as lessors, executed a lease to defendant/appellee Paul Bordallo, as lessee, for seven and one-half acres of real property in Guam. Their agreement provided for a lease of 99 years at a rent of $200 per month. The Unpingcos’ nephew, defendant/appellee Jesus Torres, served as the Unpingcos’ attorney in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Unpingco v. Hong Kong MacAu Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lazo v. Bank of America Nat. Trust and Sav. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Parrish v. Wolf Creek Federal Services, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 2018
- Studendorff v. National Semiconductor CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014