Legal Opinion
Unpingco v. Hong Kong MacAu Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1991No. 90-15725PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
935 F.2d 1043
Segundo A. UNPINGCO; Pacific Equity and Capital
Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HONG KONG MACAU CORP.; Northern Development Corp.; Baba
Corp.; Jesus U. Torres; Paul Bordallo,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-15725.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 8, 1991.*
Decided June 7, 1991.
S. "Cy" Unpingco, Pacific Lawyers Group, San Jose, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joaquin C. Arriola, Arriola, Cowan & Bordallo, Agana, Guam, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Territory of Guam, Appellate Division.
Before SCHROEDER,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E-Fab, Inc. v. Accountants, Inc. ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Nor-Cal Moving Services v. Paylocity Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2025