Legal Opinion

Lazo v. Bank of America Nat. Trust and Sav. Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1991No. 90-56128Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

952 F.2d 407

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re Romeo Alegato LAZO and Jane Strachan-Lazo, aka/dba

Jane Strachan-Lazo, M.D., Debtors.

Romeo Alegato LAZO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, et

al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-56128.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 8, 1991.*

Decided Dec. 17, 1991.

Before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Robert Leonard v. Carl W. Vrooman, Trustee InbankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. In Re ChisumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API