Legal Opinion
Johnson v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 7, 2007No. 07-1790UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On March 9, 2007, the District Court entered an order granting the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. We will affirm for the reasons discussed below.
I
On March 18, 2004, Jerith Manufacturing Co. (“Jerith”) accused pro se plaintiff Johnson of misconduct at work and terminated his employment as a mechanic. The next day, Johnson filed a grievance with his union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (Local 830), regarding the termination. 1 The union held a hearing at which Johnson claims that he was “repeatedly denied the opportunity to confront and/or cross-examine the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Kaucher v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- David Angstadt and Barbara Angstadt, Parents and Natural Guardians of Megan Angstadt, a Minor v. Midd-West School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Jackson v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
4Cited by10 opinions
- Figueroa v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- AUSTINO v. CITY OF VINELANDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Amaechi v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- BRADLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BRADLEY v. DIST. COUNCIL 47District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.