Legal Opinion
David Angstadt and Barbara Angstadt, Parents and Natural Guardians of Megan Angstadt, a Minor v. Midd-West School District
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 29, 2004No. 03-3912PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants David and Barbara Angstadt brought suit on behalf of their daughter, Megan Angstadt, against the Midd-West School District (the “School District” or “Midd-West”) for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and for violations of the Pennsylvania Public School Code of 1949, 24 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. §§ 1-101, et seq. The District Court granted the School District’s motion to dismiss 1 and the Angstadts appeal this decision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of DuarteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Lowery v. EuverardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jaimes v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.