Legal Opinion

People v. Ackerman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 20, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 14SA358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright

T 1 In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the People seek review of the trial court's order suppressing the results of a blood draw taken from the Defendant-Appel-lee, Travis Brandt Ackerman. At the suppression hearing, the trial court found that a warrant was required before the police could order a blood draw and that the police lacked exigent cireumstances that would justify the involuntary, warrantless blood draw under the Fourth Amendment. 'The People appealed on the sole issue of whether the facts of this case constituted exigent cireumstances. We hold that exigent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casillas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. Casillas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. People v. ArchuletaColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. TriplettColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API