Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1925No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

In a proceeding to assess damages for the taking of five feet of plaintiff’s property at the southwest corner of 15th and Chestnut streets in the City of Philadelphia for the purpose of widening the latter thoroughfare, the jury in the common pleas rendered a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered, and plaintiff has appealed.

On March 31, 1884, the City of Philadelphia passed an ordinance widening from fifty to sixty feet that portion of Chestnut Street extending from the Delaware River to the Schuylkill River, the ordinance providing that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kaemmerling's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Rea v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Dinger v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Pittsburgh, Bradford & Buffalo Railway Co. v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Park Avenue SewersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Rogan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Berger v. Public Parking Authority of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API