Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 10, 1978No. 35,091; NCM 77-0735PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

A statement of the facts of this case would add nothing to the law concerned with the right of the accused to have the testimony of a witness »at either a trial on the merits or in a hearing in extenuation and mitigation.1 Let it suffice to say that the United States Navy Court of Military Review found, contrary to the trial judge’s ruling, that a witness’ testimony was material.2 That court, expressing itself in United States v. Scott, 3 M.J. 1111 (N.C.M.R. 1977), concluded that a reassessment of the sentence cured the denial of testimony of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. CourtsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. CombsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. McDonaghU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. TippitU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API