Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Ensign

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1941No. 29812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Defendant in error, Georgia Ensign, brought this action against defendants in error O. E. Hunt, William C. Stighman, Pearl Stighman, and thecity of Tulsa, to recover damages suffered by her as a result of tripping over a wire which was stretched along the east side of a driveway leading from the street to the sidewalk. The property is located at 711 W. Fourth street in the city of Tulsa and was owned and occupied by defendant Hunt, William C. and Pearl Stighman (and is referred to herein as the Hunt property). Judgment was for plaintiff against all defendants; Hunt and William C. and Pearl…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . Village of HorseheadsNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Corcoran v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Dargatz v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Schramm v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Holdenville v. TalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. King v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API