Cherveny v. Hemza
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to compel defendant bank to deliver the deed and mortgage referred to in the first paragraph of the opinion. The case was tried before Fish, J., who made findings directing the bank to deliver the papers to plaintiff and ordered judgment against defendants Hemza for the sum of $1,700. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants Hemza appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action to compel the defendant State Bank of Hopkins .to deliver to the plaintiff a deed and mortgage alleged to have been left with it by the defendants Anton and Sophia Hemza in performance of a contract for the exchange of lands. There were findings and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants Hemza appeal. The defendant bank is not a party to the appeal. There is no settled case. See State v. Fish, 132 Minn. 146, 155 N. W. 905.
*401. The findings are substantially these: On December 3, 1914, the plaintiff and the defendants agreed upon the exchange of certain properties. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Godfrey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Wheadon v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- McLaughlin v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State ex rel. Hemza v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Bishop Iron Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bogestad v. BothumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956