Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1897No. Nos. 10,846-(95)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action to recover the sum of $98.90, expended by plaintiff in paying the promissory note mentioned in the opinion and in defending a suit against her upon that note. From an order of the district court for Rice county, Buckham, J., denying a motion for a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

On November 8, 1894, the plaintiff through one Lucas, an agent of defendant, made an application to defendant for a policy of life insurance on her life payable to her executors, administrators or assigns. The first annual premium on the policy amounted to $83.60 and at the request of Lucas she made to his order her promissory note in writing for that sum, payable in one year from said date. The note was indorsed by her husband and she delivered it to Lucas together with said application. Lucas never turned the note over to the defendant company or accounted to it for the same, but before the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. New York Life Insurance v. PikeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Lendway v. MuseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Palmyra Board of Education v. HansenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Silco Automatic Vending Co., Inc. v. HowellsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API