Legal Opinion

Martin Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1962No. Appeal, No. 88PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the Bureau of Employment Security concluded the claimant was guilty of willful misconduct and disqualified for benefits under the provisions of §402(e) of the law, 43 PS §802(e). The Referee reversed the Bureau and allowed benefits. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review reversed the Referee and disqualified the claimant under the provisions of §402(b) (1) of the law, 43 PS §802(b) (1), on the ground that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.

The claimant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Kaylock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Mikanowicz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Domico Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API