Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Titus County Court; W. E. Riddle, Judge. Action by L. M. Rogers against R. H. Fuller and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The suit was by appellant against appellees to recover the possession of a mule colt, or, in the alternative, the value thereof, alleged to be the sum of $125. In the justice court the judgment was in appellant's favor, but in the county court, to which an appeal was prosecuted, the judgment was in favor of appellees. It seems that one John Rogers died intestate, owning, besides real estate, certain personal property, consisting of horses, mules, and money. Appellant was one of his heirs, and by a power of attorney, in the execution of which he was joined by the other heirs, authorized one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Stockbridge v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 17 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1073, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,031 in the Matter of C.T. Bessent and Sylvia R. Bessent, Debtors. C.T. Bessent and Sylvia R. Bessent v. United States of America (Farmers Home Administration)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Bessent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API