Legal Opinion

Stockbridge v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Greer County. Tried below before Hon. W. D. Ballard.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

Appellants sued appellee to recover damages for the conversion of fifteen head of cattle. Both parties asserted title under E. H. Stockbridge, appellants as purchasers, and appellee as a prior lien-holder under a mortgage authorizing him to take possession of and sell the cattle upon the failure of E. H. Stockbridge to pay certain debts at maturity.

The uncontroverted testimony shows that the defendant took the cattle from the actual possession and without the consent of the plaintiffs; that he claimed the right so to do under his alleged mortgage from E. H. Stockbridge;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Colorado v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Rindskoff, Stern, Lauer & Co. v. VanleerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific Finance Corp. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. United States Supply Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Chavez v. SchairerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Rogers v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Rogers v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API