Marsh v. Webber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Rice county, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. A sufficient statement of the case appears in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
McMillan, J.
The complaint alleges, that on the 20th of September, 1866, the plaintiff purchased of the defendant 432 sheep, for the sum of $1,275; that the defendant knowing at the time that the sheep were unsound and diseased with a contagious disease called the scab, falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff, that the sheep were all sound, and right and free from any disease, and the plaintiff, relying upon such false and fraudulent representations, and believing them to be true, purchased the sheep. The complaint further alleges, that the plaintiff, at the time he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wintz v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Sherrod v. LangdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Frohreich v. GammonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Robertson v. HaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Glaspey v. Wool Growers Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.