Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Arnett

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1942No. 5490PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLEY, Justice.

This cause involves fees allowed a receiver and fees allowed his attorneys in Cause 9598 in the 72 District Court of Lubbock County, wherein Sam C. Arnett was appointed receiver for the Mallet Land & Cattle Company, and Jack M. Randal and F. D. Brown were appointed his attorneys. The Mallet Land & Cattle Company is a Missouri corporation which owns various leagues of very valuable oil land situated in Hockley,' Cochran, Yoakum, and Terry Counties, Texas, the income from which is now about $30,000 per month.

The authority of the trial court to appoint the receiver originally was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stinnett v. Paramount-Famous Lasky Corp. of New YorkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Cullum v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Morrow v. De VittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. De Vitt v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patrick Ludwick, as President, Shareholder and Trustee of Federal Auto Standards, Inc., Doing Business as Auto Critic v. Janet L. Girard, Laurence Girard and Eric L. Girard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API