Legal Opinion
Morrow v. De Vitt
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 2, 1942No. Nos. 5432, 5433PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Chief Justice.
The two above styled and numbered cases were tried together by the court below who refused to grant a motion to try them separately and by his order one statement of facts only was made and filed in this court to be considered as a part of each of the records.
There are two appeals, one from the refusal of the trial court to confirm an oil, gas and mineral lease made by Sam C. Arnett, the receiver of the Mallet Land and Cattle Company, a Missouri corporation, with T. F. Morrow, lessee, on certain oil, gas and mineral lands, and a lease on certain oil, gas and mineral…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pearson v. FlanaganTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Allen v. StephanusTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Allen v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Baker v. ClepperTexas Supreme Court · 1863
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Perren v. Baker Hotel of Dallas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Baldwin v. New, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Smith v. WaymanTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Knowlton v. United States Brass Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.