JRD Development Joint Venture v. Catlin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiffs relief from a judgment pursuant to ORCP 71C. 1 We reverse.
Defendants rented a house from plaintiffs. It had bare electrical wires, contaminated water, a septic system that leaked sewage and other problems. Defendants stopped paying rent. Plaintiffs brought a forcible entry and detainer action against them. Defendants counter-claimed that plaintiffs failed to make repairs and abused their right of access to the premises. In reliance on the testimony of defendant Christina Catlin, the trial court found that the house was uninhabitable and had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friese v. HummelOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Oregon-Washington R. & Navigation Co. v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- MBNA America Bank, N. A. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Heritage Properties v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Taylor v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.