Legal Opinion

JRD Development Joint Venture v. Catlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1992No. 91-3042; CA A72345PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiffs relief from a judgment pursuant to ORCP 71C. 1 We reverse.

Defendants rented a house from plaintiffs. It had bare electrical wires, contaminated water, a septic system that leaked sewage and other problems. Defendants stopped paying rent. Plaintiffs brought a forcible entry and detainer action against them. Defendants counter-claimed that plaintiffs failed to make repairs and abused their right of access to the premises. In reliance on the testimony of defendant Christina Catlin, the trial court found that the house was uninhabitable and had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friese v. HummelOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Oregon-Washington R. & Navigation Co. v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. MBNA America Bank, N. A. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Heritage Properties v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Taylor v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API