Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 2003No. C990709CV; A112983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals an order denying his motion for a satisfaction of judgment and overruling his objections to a supplemental judgment. We vacate the supplemental judgment and reverse and remand for entry of a satisfaction of the judgment.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. The parties entered into an oral contract in the State of Washington. Their contract did not include a provision for an award of attorney fees for enforcement of its terms. In 1997, a dispute arose over the amount that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff, and, as a result, plaintiff initiated an action for breach of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Condliff v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Bennett v. BaughOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Sterling Savings Bank v. Emerald Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Trent v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Trent v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API